<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Law May Require Websites To Be Accessible To Disabled Users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seodisco.com/law-may-require-websites-to-be-accessible-to-disabled-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seodisco.com/law-may-require-websites-to-be-accessible-to-disabled-users/</link>
	<description>SEO Blog by Kid Disco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:05:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Newell</title>
		<link>http://www.seodisco.com/law-may-require-websites-to-be-accessible-to-disabled-users/comment-page-1/#comment-39621</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Newell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seodisco.com/2007/10/14/law-may-require-webistes-to-be-accessible-to-disabled-users/#comment-39621</guid>
		<description>You have a very general title for a rather specific case. 

&quot;Disabled&quot; means very different things to different users. People who have motor impairment are going to need different features to those who are visually impaired. 

Are we going to be sued by every single issue action group with a bee in its bonnet? 

At some stage the law of diminishing returns kicks in...and what happens when a change introduced for one &quot;disabled&quot; group reduces access for another group?

O Lordy!

We can easily fix ALT tags tho! 

:-)

Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a very general title for a rather specific case. </p>
<p>&#8220;Disabled&#8221; means very different things to different users. People who have motor impairment are going to need different features to those who are visually impaired. </p>
<p>Are we going to be sued by every single issue action group with a bee in its bonnet? </p>
<p>At some stage the law of diminishing returns kicks in&#8230;and what happens when a change introduced for one &#8220;disabled&#8221; group reduces access for another group?</p>
<p>O Lordy!</p>
<p>We can easily fix ALT tags tho! </p>
<p> <img src='http://www.seodisco.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

